Skip to contents

Operational Effect Size

Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)

Ξ›OLS=𝐉TΞ»/𝐉T𝐑𝐉\Lambda_{OLS} = \mathbf{J}^T \lambda / \sqrt{\mathbf{J}^T \mathbf{R} \mathbf{J}} \qquadTOLS=𝐉T𝐙𝐉T𝐑̂𝐉=βˆ‘k=1mZkβˆ‘k,kβ€²=1mRΜ‚kkβ€² T_{OLS} = \frac{\mathbf{J}^T\mathbf{Z}}{\sqrt{\mathbf{J}^T\hat{\mathbf{R}}\mathbf{J}}} = \frac{\sum_{k=1}^m Z_k}{\sqrt{\sum_{k,k'=1}^m \hat{R}_{kk'}}}

Generalized Least Squares (GLS)

Ξ›GLS=𝐉Tπ‘βˆ’1λ𝐉Tπ‘βˆ’1𝐉 \Lambda_{GLS} = \frac{\mathbf{J}^T\mathbf{R}^{-1}\lambda}{\sqrt{\mathbf{J}^T\mathbf{R}^{-1}\mathbf{J}}}

TGLS=𝐉Tπ‘Μ‚βˆ’1𝐙𝐉Tπ‘Μ‚βˆ’1𝐉 T_{GLS} = \frac{\mathbf{J}^T\hat{\mathbf{R}}^{-1}\mathbf{Z}}{\sqrt{\mathbf{J}^T\hat{\mathbf{R}}^{-1}\mathbf{J}}}

Type I Error

Equal nn and df=2nβˆ’2df = 2n-2

Pow(n,Ξ›)=P{T(n2Ξ›,2nβˆ’2)>tΞ±,2nβˆ’2}Pow(n, \Lambda) = P\left\{T\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{2}}\Lambda, 2n - 2\right) > t_{\alpha,2n-2}\right\} \qquad

General Case

Pow(n,Ξ›)=P{T(n0n1n0+n1Ξ›,df)>tΞ±,df}Pow(n, \Lambda) = P\left\{T\left(\sqrt{\frac{n_0n_1}{n_0 + n_1}}\Lambda, df\right) > t_{\alpha,df}\right\} \qquad

Degrees of freedom (dfdf):

  • Dallow (2008): n0+n1βˆ’2n_0 + n_1 - 2

  • O’Brien (1984): n0+n1βˆ’2*mn_0 + n_1 - 2*m ,

  • Logan and Tamhane (2004): 0.5(n0+n1βˆ’2)/(1+1/m2)0.5(n_0 + n_1 - 2)/(1 + 1/m^2)

P-value Combination

Fisher’s Method (1932)

Letting p1,p2,…,pkp_1, p_2, \ldots, p_k denote the individual (one- or two-sided) p-values of the kk hypothesis tests to be combined, the test statistic is then computed with

X2=βˆ’2βˆ‘i=1kln(pi).X^2 = -2 \sum_{i=1}^k \ln(p_i).

Under the joint null hypothesis, the test statistic follows a chi-square distribution with 2k2k degrees of freedom which is used to compute the combined p-value.

Fisher’s method assumes that the p-values to be combined are independent. If this is not the case, the method can either be conservative (not reject often enough) or liberal (reject too often), depending on the dependence structure among the tests. In this case, one can adjust the method to account for such dependence (to bring the Type I error rate closer to some desired nominal significance level).

Stouffer’s Method (1949)

Letting p1,p2,…,pkp_1, p_2, \ldots, p_k denote the individual (one- or two-sided) p-values of the kk hypothesis tests to be combined, the test statistic is then computed with

z=βˆ‘i=1kzi/kz = \sum_{i=1}^k z_i/\sqrt{k}

where zi=Ξ¦βˆ’1(1βˆ’pi)z_i = \Phi^{-1}(1 - p_i) and Ξ¦βˆ’1(β‹…)\Phi^{-1}(\cdot) denotes the inverse of the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal distribution. Under the joint null hypothesis, the test statistic follows a standard normal distribution which is used to compute the combined p-value.

Stouffer’s method assumes that the p-values to be combined are independent. If this is not the case, the method can either be conservative (not reject often enough) or liberal (reject too often), depending on the dependence structure among the tests. In this case, one can adjust the method to account for such dependence (to bring the Type I error rate closer to some desired nominal significance level).

Adjustment of dependence

Adjustment Based on the Effective Number of Tests based on Nyholt, 2004

m=1+(kβˆ’1)1βˆ’Var(ev)km = 1 + (k - 1) \frac{1 - Var(ev)}{k}

where evev is eigenvalues of correlation matrix RR among tests, and kk is the number of tests

Reference

Luo X, Li L, Savenkov O, Liu W, Ni X, Tang W, Guo W. Multiple Comparisons Procedures for Analyses of Joint Primary Endpoints and Secondary Endpoints. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2025;24(3):e70010. doi: 10.1002/pst.70010.

Dallow NS, Leonov SL, Roger JH. Practical usage of O’Brien’s OLS and GLS statistics in clinical trials. Pharm Stat. 2008 Jan-Mar;7(1):53-68. doi: 10.1002/pst.268. PMID: 17390306